This file was created by the TYPO3 extension bib --- Timezone: UTC Creation date: 2024-11-21 Creation time: 13-19-57 --- Number of references 26 inproceedings 2015-gerdes-authorization 2015 9 iotsec Online D•A•CH Security 2015 Sankt Augustin, Germany D•A•CH Security 2015 08.09. - 09.09.2015 accepted de 1 StefanieGerdes RenéHummen OlafBergmann techreport 2015-draft-moskowitz-hip-dex-04 2015 7 20 draft-moskowitz-hip-dex-04 This document specifies the Host Identity Protocol Diet EXchange (HIP DEX), a variant of the Host Identity Protocol Version 2 (HIPv2). The HIP DEX protocol design aims at reducing the overhead of the employed cryptographic primitives by omitting public-key signatures and hash functions. In doing so, the main goal is to still deliver similar security properties to HIPv2. The HIP DEX protocol is primarily designed for computation or memory-constrained sensor/actuator devices. Like HIPv2, it is expected to be used together with a suitable security protocol such as the Encapsulated Security Payload (ESP) for the protection of upper layer protocol data. In addition, HIP DEX can also be used as a keying mechanism for security primitives at the MAC layer, e.g., for IEEE 802.15.4 networks. Work in progress iotsec; ietf http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-moskowitz-hip-dex-04 Online Internet Engineering Task Force Internet-Draft en RobertMoskowitz RenéHummen techreport 2015-draft-moskowitz-hip-dex-03 2015 6 19 draft-moskowitz-hip-dex-03 This document specifies the Host Identity Protocol Diet EXchange (HIP DEX), a variant of the Host Identity Protocol Version 2 (HIPv2). The HIP DEX protocol design aims at reducing the overhead of the employed cryptographic primitives by omitting public-key signatures and hash functions. In doing so, the main goal is to still deliver similar security properties to HIPv2. The HIP DEX protocol is primarily designed for computation or memory-constrained sensor/actuator devices. Like HIPv2, it is expected to be used together with a suitable security protocol such as the Encapsulated Security Payload (ESP) for the protection of upper layer protocol data. In addition, HIP DEX can also be used as a keying mechanism for security primitives at the MAC layer, e.g., for IEEE 802.15.4 networks. Work in progress iotsec; ietf http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-moskowitz-hip-dex-03 Online Internet Engineering Task Force Internet-Draft en RobertMoskowitz RenéHummen techreport 2014-draft-moskowitz-hip-dex-02 2014 12 19 draft-moskowitz-hip-dex-02 This document specifies the Host Identity Protocol Diet EXchange (HIP DEX), a variant of the Host Identity Protocol Version 2 (HIPv2). The HIP DEX protocol design aims at reducing the overhead of the employed cryptographic primitives by omitting public-key signatures and hash functions. In doing so, the main goal is to still deliver similar security properties to HIPv2. The HIP DEX protocol is primarily designed for computation or memory-constrained sensor/actuator devices. Like HIPv2, it is expected to be used together with a suitable security protocol such as the Encapsulated Security Payload (ESP) for the protection of upper layer protocol data. In addition, HIP DEX can also be used as a keying mechanism for security primitives at the MAC layer, e.g., for IEEE 802.15.4 networks. Work in progress iotsec; ietf http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-moskowitz-hip-dex-02 Online Internet Engineering Task Force Internet-Draft en RobertMoskowitz RenéHummen inproceedings 2014-hummen-delegation 2014 6 30 284-292 iotsec; sensorcloud http://www.comsys.rwth-aachen.de/fileadmin/papers/2014/2014-hummen-secon-delegation.pdf Online IEEE 11th IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking (SECON 2014) Singapore 11th IEEE International Conference on Sensor, Communication, and Networking (SECON 2014) 30.06. - 03.07.2014 en 10.1109/SAHCN.2014.6990364 1 RenéHummen HosseinShafagh ShahidRaza ThiemoVoigt KlausWehrle techreport 2014-draft-moskowitz-hip-dex-01 2014 3 4 draft-moskowitz-hip-dex-01 This document specifies the Host Identity Protocol Diet EXchange (HIP DEX), a variant of the HIP Base EXchange (HIP BEX) [rfc5201-bis]. The HIP DEX protocol design aims at reducing the overhead of the employed cryptographic primitives by omitting public-key signatures and hash functions. In doing so, the main goal is to still deliver similar security properties to HIP BEX. The HIP DEX protocol is primarily targeted at computation or memory-constrained sensor devices. Like HIP BEX, it is expected to be used together with another suitable security protocol such as the Encapsulated Security Payload (ESP) [rfc5202-bis] for the protection of upper layer protocols. HIP DEX can also be used as a keying mechanism for a MAC layer security protocol as is supported by IEEE 802.15.4 [IEEE.802-15-4.2011]. Work in progress iotsec; ietf http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-moskowitz-hip-dex-01 Online Internet Engineering Task Force Internet-Draft en RobertMoskowitz RenéHummen techreport 2013-draft-hummen-dtls-extended-session-resumption-01 2013 10 18 draft-hummen-dtls-extended-session-resumption-01 This draft defines two extensions for the existing session resumption mechanisms of TLS that specifically apply to Datagram TLS (DTLS) in constrained network environments. Session resumption type negotiation enables the client and the server to explicitly agree on the session resumption mechanism for subsequent handshakes, thus avoiding unnecessary overheads occurring with the existing specifications. Session resumption without client-side state additionally enables a constrained DTLS client to resume a session without the need to maintain state while the session is inactive. The extensions defined in this draft update [RFC5077] and [RFC5246]. Work in progress iotsec; ietf http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hummen-dtls-extended-session-resumption-01 Online Internet Engineering Task Force Internet-Draft en RenéHummen JohannesGilger HosseinShafagh inproceedings 2013-hummen-standards 2013 10 7 1-3 iotsec https://www.comsys.rwth-aachen.de/fileadmin/papers/2013/2013-hummen-standards.pdf Online IEEE 21st IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP 2013 PhD Forum), Göttingen, Germany Göttingen, Germany PhD Forum of 21st IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP 2013 PhD Forum) 7 Oct. 2013 en 978-1-4799-1270-4 10.1109/ICNP.2013.6733648 1 RenéHummen KlausWehrle inproceedings 2013-hummen-slimfit 2013 10 7 259-266 iotsec https://www.comsys.rwth-aachen.de/fileadmin/papers/2013/2013-hummen-slimfit.pdf Online IEEE Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob), 2013 IEEE 9th International Conference on Lyon, France IEEE WiMob 2013 Workshop on the Internet of Things Communications and Technologies (IoT 2013) en 978-1-4577-2014-7 2160-4886 10.1109/WiMOB.2013.6673370 1 RenéHummen JensHiller MartinHenze KlausWehrle inproceedings 2013-icnp-hummen-tailoring 2013 10 7 1-10 iotsec https://www.comsys.rwth-aachen.de/fileadmin/papers/2013/2013-hummen-tailoring.pdf Online IEEE In Proceedings of the 21st IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP 2013), Göttingen, Germany Göttingen, Germany 21st IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP 2013) 7-10 Oct. 2013 en 978-1-4799-1270-4 10.1109/ICNP.2013.6733571 1 RenéHummen HannoWirtz Jan HenrikZiegeldorf JensHiller KlausWehrle article 2013-raza-lithe IEEE Sensors Journal 2013 10 13 10 3711-3720 Internet of Things;operating systems (computers);personal area networks;protocols;security of data;6LoWPAN standard;Contiki operating system;DTLS;Internet of Things;IoT;Lithe;authenticated confidential communication;constrained application protocol;datagram transport layer security;e-health domain;end-to-end security;lightweight secure CoAP;resource-constrained devices;Encoding;Internet;Payloads;Protocols;Security;Sensors;Standards;6LoWPAN;CoAP;CoAPs;DTLS;IoT;security iotsec en 1530-437X 10.1109/JSEN.2013.2277656 1 ShahidRaza HosseinShafagh KasunHewage RenéHummen ThiemoVoigt techreport 2013-draft-garcia-core-security-06 2013 9 11 draft-garcia-core-security-06 A direct interpretation of the Internet of Things concept refers to the usage of standard Internet protocols to allow for human-to-thing or thing-to-thing communication. Although the security needs are well-recognized, it is still not fully clear how existing IP-based security protocols can be applied to this new setting. This Internet-Draft first provides an overview of security architecture, its deployment model and general security needs in the context of the lifecycle of a thing. Then, it presents challenges and requirements for the successful roll-out of new applications and usage of standard IP-based security protocols when applied to get a functional Internet of Things. Work in progress iotsec; ietf http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-garcia-core-security-06 Online Internet Engineering Task Force Internet-Draft en OscarGarcia-Morchon Sye LoongKeoh Sandeep S.Kumar RenéHummen RenéStruik techreport draft-hummen-dtls-extended-session-resumption-00 2013 7 15 draft-hummen-dtls-extended-session-resumption-00 This draft defines two extensions for the existing session resumption mechanisms of TLS that specifically apply to Datagram TLS (DTLS) in constrained network environments. Session resumption type negotiation enables the client and the server to explicitly agree on the session resumption mechanism for subsequent handshakes, thus avoiding unnecessary overheads occurring with the existing specifications. Session resumption without client-side state additionally enables a constrained DTLS client to resume a session without the need to maintain state while the session is inactive. The extensions defined in this draft update [RFC5077] and [RFC5246]. Work in progress iotsec; ietf http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hummen-dtls-extended-session-resumption-00 Online Internet Engineering Task Force Internet-Draft en RenéHummen JohannesGilger inproceedings 2013-hummen-towards 2013 4 19 iotsec fileadmin/papers/2013/2013-hummen-towards.pdf ACM Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Workshop on Hot Topics on Wireless Network Security and Privacy (HotWiSec '13) Budapest, Hungary 2nd ACM Workshop on Hot Topics on Wireless Network Security and Privacy en 978-1-4503-2003-0 10.1145/2463183.2463193 1 RenéHummen Jan HenrikZiegeldorf HosseinShafagh ShahidRaza KlausWehrle inproceedings 2013-hummen-6lowpan 2013 4 17 iotsec; sensorcloud fileadmin/papers/2013/2013-hummen-6lowpan.pdf ACM Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Security and Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks (WiSec '13) Budapest, Hungary 6th ACM Conference on Security and Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks (WiSec '13) en 978-1-4503-1998-0 10.1145/2462096.2462107 1 RenéHummen JensHiller HannoWirtz MartinHenze HosseinShafagh KlausWehrle techreport 2013-draft-garcia-core-security-05 2013 3 11 draft-garcia-core-security-05 A direct interpretation of the Internet of Things concept refers to the usage of standard Internet protocols to allow for human-to-thing or thing-to-thing communication. Although the security needs are well-recognized, it is still not fully clear how existing IP-based security protocols can be applied to this new setting. This Internet-Draft first provides an overview of security architecture, its deployment model and general security needs in the context of the lifecycle of a thing. Then, it presents challenges and requirements for the successful roll-out of new applications and usage of standard IP-based security protocols when applied to get a functional Internet of Things. Work in progress iotsec; ietf http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-garcia-core-security-05 Online Internet Engineering Task Force Internet-Draft en OscarGarcia-Morchon Sye LoongKeoh Sandeep S.Kumar RenéHummen RenéStruik techreport 2013-draft-hummen-hip-middle-puzzle-01 2013 1 9 draft-hummen-hip-middle-puzzle-01 The Host Identity Protocol [RFC5201] is a secure signaling protocol with a cryptographic namespace. It provides the communicating peers with a cryptographic puzzle mechanism to protect against Denial of Service (DoS) attacks exploiting the computation and memory overheads of the protocol exchange. This document specifies an extension of the protocol that enables an on-path network entity to assist in the choice of the puzzle difficulty in case of an attack. Furthermore, it defines a modification of the puzzle mechanism that enables a host to delegate puzzle solving to an on-path network entity. Work in progress iotsec; ietf http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hummen-hip-middle-puzzle-01 Online Internet Engineering Task Force Internet-Draft en RenéHummen MartinHenze JensHiller techreport 2012-draft-hummen-hip-middle-puzzle 2012 7 9 draft-hummen-hip-middle-puzzle-00 The Host Identity Protocol [RFC5201] is a secure signaling protocol with a cryptographic namespace. It provides the communicating peers with a cryptographic puzzle mechanism to protect against Denial of Service (DoS) attacks targeting its computation and memory overhead. This document specifies an extension that enables middleboxes to assist in the choice of the puzzle difficulty as well as in solving the puzzle on behalf of the host. Work in progress iotsec; ietf http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hummen-hip-middle-puzzle-00 Internet Engineering Task Force Internet-Draft RenéHummen MartinHenze techreport 2012-draft-garcia-core-security 2012 3 26 draft-garcia-core-security-04 A direct interpretation of the Internet of Things concept refers to the usage of standard Internet protocols to allow for human-to-thing or thing-to-thing communication. Although the security needs are well-recognized, it is still not fully clear how existing IP-based security protocols can be applied to this new setting. This Internet-Draft first provides an overview of security architecture, its deployment model and general security needs in the context of the lifecycle of a thing. Then, it presents challenges and requirements for the successful roll-out of new applications and usage of standard IP-based security protocols when applied to get a functional Internet of Things. Work in progress iotsec; ietf http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-garcia-core-security-04 Online Internet Engineering Task Force Internet-Draft en OscarGarcia-Morchon Sye LoongKeoh Sandeep S.Kumar RenéHummen RenéStruik miscellaneous 2012-hummen-iot-trust 2012 3 20 iotsec fileadmin/papers/2012/2012-hummen-iot-trust.pdf Online Workshop on Smart Object Security en 1 RenéHummen ChristianRöller KlausWehrle techreport 2011-draft-garcia-core-security-03 2011 10 31 draft-garcia-core-security-03 A direct interpretation of the Internet of Things concept refers to the usage of standard Internet protocols to allow for human-to-thing or thing-to-thing communication. Although the security needs are well-recognized, it is still not fully clear how existing IP-based security protocols can be applied to this new setting. This Internet-Draft first provides an overview of security architecture, its deployment model and general security needs in the context of the lifecycle of a thing. Then, it presents challenges and requirements for the successful roll-out of new applications and usage of standard IP-based security protocols when applied to get a functional Internet of Things. Work in progress iotsec; ietf http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-garcia-core-security-03 Online Internet Engineering Task Force Internet-Draft en OscarGarcia-Morchon Sye LoongKeoh Sandeep S.Kumar RenéHummen RenéStruik article 2011-heer-iot-journal Springer Wireless Personal Communications Journal 2011 10 61 3 527-542 A direct interpretation of the term Internet of Things refers to the use of standard Internet protocols for the human-to-thing or thing-to-thing communication in embedded networks. Although the security needs are well-recognized in this domain, it is still not fully understood how existing IP security protocols and architectures can be deployed. In this paper, we discuss the applicability and limitations of existing Internet protocols and security architectures in the context of the Internet of Things. First, we give an overview of the deployment model and general security needs. We then present challenges and requirements for IP-based security solutions and highlight specific technical limitations of standard IP security protocols. iotsec fileadmin/papers/2011/2011-heer-iot-challenges.pdf Online Springer

Netherlands

en 0929-6212 10.1007/s11277-011-0385-5 1 TobiasHeer OscarGarcia-Morchon RenéHummen Sye LoongKeoh Sandeep S.Kumar KlausWehrle techreport 2011-draft-garcia-core-security-02 2011 7 11 draft-garcia-core-security-02 A direct interpretation of the Internet of Things concept refers to the usage of standard Internet protocols to allow for human-to-thing or thing-to-thing communication. Although the security needs are well-recognized, it is still not fully clear how existing IP-based security protocols can be applied to this new setting. This Internet-Draft first provides an overview of security architecture, its deployment model and general security needs in the context of the lifecycle of a thing. Then, it presents challenges and requirements for the successful roll-out of new applications and usage of standard IP-based security protocols when applied to get a functional Internet of Things. Work in progress iotsec; ietf http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-garcia-core-security-02 Online Internet Engineering Task Force Internet-Draft en OscarGarcia-Morchon Sye LoongKeoh Sandeep S.Kumar RenéHummen RenéStruik miscellaneous 2011-hummen-adaptationlayer 2011 3 25 iotsec fileadmin/papers/2011/2011-hummen-smartobjects-adaptationlayer.pdf Online Interconnecting Smart Objects with the Internet Workshop en 1 RenéHummen TobiasHeer KlausWehrle techreport 2011-draft-garcia-core-security-01 2011 3 14 draft-garcia-core-security-01 A direct interpretation of the Internet of Things concept refers to the usage of standard Internet protocols to allow for human-to-thing or thing-to-thing communication. Although the security needs are well-recognized, it is still not fully clear how existing IP-based security protocols can be applied to this new setting. This Internet-Draft first provides an overview of security architecture, its deployment model and general security needs in the context of the lifecycle of a thing. Then, it presents challenges and requirements for the successful roll-out of new applications and usage of standard IP-based security protocols when applied to get a functional Internet of Things. Work in progress iotsec; ietf http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-garcia-core-security-01 Online Internet Engineering Task Force Internet-Draft en OscarGarcia-Morchon Sye LoongKeoh Sandeep S.Kumar RenéHummen RenéStruik techreport 2011-draft-garcia-core-security-00 2011 3 7 draft-garcia-core-security-00 A direct interpretation of the Internet of Things concept refers to the usage of standard Internet protocols to allow for human-to-thing or thing-to-thing communication. Although the security needs are well-recognized, it is still not fully clear how existing IP-based security protocols can be applied to this new setting. This Internet-Draft first provides an overview of security architecture, its deployment model and general security needs in the context of the lifecycle of a thing. Then, it presents challenges and requirements for the successful roll-out of new applications and usage of standard IP-based security protocols when applied to get a functional Internet of Things. Work in progress iotsec; ietf http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-garcia-core-security-00 Online Internet Engineering Task Force Internet-Draft en OscarGarcia-Morchon Sye LoongKeoh Sandeep S.Kumar RenéHummen RenéStruik